mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2025-01-16 18:26:42 +00:00
blk-mq: fix potential io hang by wrong 'wake_batch'
[ Upstream commit 4f1731df60f9033669f024d06ae26a6301260b55 ] In __blk_mq_tag_busy/idle(), updating 'active_queues' and calculating 'wake_batch' is not atomic: t1: t2: _blk_mq_tag_busy blk_mq_tag_busy inc active_queues // assume 1->2 inc active_queues // 2 -> 3 blk_mq_update_wake_batch // calculate based on 3 blk_mq_update_wake_batch /* calculate based on 2, while active_queues is actually 3. */ Fix this problem by protecting them wih 'tags->lock', this is not a hot path, so performance should not be concerned. And now that all writers are inside the lock, switch 'actives_queues' from atomic to unsigned int. Fixes: 180dccb0dba4 ("blk-mq: fix tag_get wait task can't be awakened") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230610023043.2559121-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c2a0eb3b20
commit
931bd6758b
@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static void blk_mq_debugfs_tags_show(struct seq_file *m,
|
||||
seq_printf(m, "nr_tags=%u\n", tags->nr_tags);
|
||||
seq_printf(m, "nr_reserved_tags=%u\n", tags->nr_reserved_tags);
|
||||
seq_printf(m, "active_queues=%d\n",
|
||||
atomic_read(&tags->active_queues));
|
||||
READ_ONCE(tags->active_queues));
|
||||
|
||||
seq_puts(m, "\nbitmap_tags:\n");
|
||||
sbitmap_queue_show(&tags->bitmap_tags, m);
|
||||
|
@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static void blk_mq_update_wake_batch(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
|
||||
void __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int users;
|
||||
struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* calling test_bit() prior to test_and_set_bit() is intentional,
|
||||
@ -57,9 +58,11 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
users = atomic_inc_return(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
|
||||
|
||||
blk_mq_update_wake_batch(hctx->tags, users);
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&tags->lock);
|
||||
users = tags->active_queues + 1;
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(tags->active_queues, users);
|
||||
blk_mq_update_wake_batch(tags, users);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&tags->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -92,9 +95,11 @@ void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
users = atomic_dec_return(&tags->active_queues);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&tags->lock);
|
||||
users = tags->active_queues - 1;
|
||||
WRITE_ONCE(tags->active_queues, users);
|
||||
blk_mq_update_wake_batch(tags, users);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&tags->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(tags, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -362,8 +362,7 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
|
||||
|
||||
users = READ_ONCE(hctx->tags->active_queues);
|
||||
if (!users)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -745,8 +745,7 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
|
||||
struct blk_mq_tags {
|
||||
unsigned int nr_tags;
|
||||
unsigned int nr_reserved_tags;
|
||||
|
||||
atomic_t active_queues;
|
||||
unsigned int active_queues;
|
||||
|
||||
struct sbitmap_queue bitmap_tags;
|
||||
struct sbitmap_queue breserved_tags;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user