mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 09:16:33 +00:00
bpf: Postpone bpf_obj_free_fields to the rcu callback
A later patch will enable the uptr usage in the task_local_storage map. This will require the unpin_user_page() to be done after the rcu task trace gp for the cases that the uptr may still be used by a bpf prog. The bpf_obj_free_fields() will be the one doing unpin_user_page(), so this patch is to postpone calling bpf_obj_free_fields() to the rcu callback. The bpf_obj_free_fields() is only required to be done in the rcu callback when bpf->bpf_ma==true and reuse_now==false. bpf->bpf_ma==true case is because uptr will only be enabled in task storage which has already been moved to bpf_mem_alloc. The bpf->bpf_ma==false case can be supported in the future also if there is a need. reuse_now==false when the selem (aka storage) is deleted by bpf prog (bpf_task_storage_delete) or by syscall delete_elem(). In both cases, bpf_obj_free_fields() needs to wait for rcu gp. A few words on reuse_now==true. reuse_now==true when the storage's owner (i.e. the task_struct) is destructing or the map itself is doing map_free(). In both cases, no bpf prog should have a hold on the selem and its uptrs, so there is no need to postpone bpf_obj_free_fields(). reuse_now==true should be the common case for local storage usage where the storage exists throughout the lifetime of its owner (task_struct). The bpf_obj_free_fields() needs to use the map->record. Doing bpf_obj_free_fields() in a rcu callback will require the bpf_local_storage_map_free() to wait for rcu_barrier. An optimization could be only waiting for rcu_barrier when the map has uptr in its map_value. This will require either yet another rcu callback function or adding a bool in the selem to flag if the SDATA(selem)->smap is still valid. This patch chooses to keep it simple and wait for rcu_barrier for maps that use bpf_mem_alloc. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023234759.860539-6-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5bd5bab766
commit
9bac675e63
@ -209,8 +209,12 @@ static void __bpf_selem_free(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
|
||||
static void bpf_selem_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem;
|
||||
struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
|
||||
|
||||
selem = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_local_storage_elem, rcu);
|
||||
/* The bpf_local_storage_map_free will wait for rcu_barrier */
|
||||
smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, 1);
|
||||
bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
|
||||
bpf_mem_cache_raw_free(selem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -226,16 +230,25 @@ void bpf_selem_free(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
|
||||
struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
|
||||
bool reuse_now)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!smap->bpf_ma) {
|
||||
/* Only task storage has uptrs and task storage
|
||||
* has moved to bpf_mem_alloc. Meaning smap->bpf_ma == true
|
||||
* for task storage, so this bpf_obj_free_fields() won't unpin
|
||||
* any uptr.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
|
||||
__bpf_selem_free(selem, reuse_now);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!reuse_now) {
|
||||
call_rcu_tasks_trace(&selem->rcu, bpf_selem_free_trace_rcu);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (reuse_now) {
|
||||
/* reuse_now == true only happens when the storage owner
|
||||
* (e.g. task_struct) is being destructed or the map itself
|
||||
* is being destructed (ie map_free). In both cases,
|
||||
* no bpf prog can have a hold on the selem. It is
|
||||
* safe to unpin the uptrs and free the selem now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bpf_obj_free_fields(smap->map.record, SDATA(selem)->data);
|
||||
/* Instead of using the vanilla call_rcu(),
|
||||
* bpf_mem_cache_free will be able to reuse selem
|
||||
* immediately.
|
||||
@ -243,7 +256,10 @@ void bpf_selem_free(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
|
||||
migrate_disable();
|
||||
bpf_mem_cache_free(&smap->selem_ma, selem);
|
||||
migrate_enable();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
call_rcu_tasks_trace(&selem->rcu, bpf_selem_free_trace_rcu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void bpf_selem_free_list(struct hlist_head *list, bool reuse_now)
|
||||
@ -908,6 +924,9 @@ void bpf_local_storage_map_free(struct bpf_map *map,
|
||||
synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
|
||||
if (smap->bpf_ma) {
|
||||
rcu_barrier_tasks_trace();
|
||||
if (!rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp())
|
||||
rcu_barrier();
|
||||
bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(&smap->selem_ma);
|
||||
bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(&smap->storage_ma);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user