mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 17:25:38 +00:00
kexec: Improve & fix crash_exclude_mem_range() to handle overlapping ranges
The crash_exclude_mem_range() function can only handle one memory region a time. It will fail in the case in which the passed in area covers several memory regions. In this case, it will only exclude the first region, then return, but leave the later regions unsolved. E.g in a NEC system with two usable RAM regions inside the low 1M: ... BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000003efff] usable BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000003f000-0x000000000003ffff] reserved BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000040000-0x000000000009ffff] usable It will only exclude the memory region [0, 0x3efff], the memory region [0x40000, 0x9ffff] will still be added into /proc/vmcore, which may cause the following failure when dumping vmcore: ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000000040000 - 0x0000000000040fff WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 665 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:186 __ioremap_caller+0x2c7/0x2e0 ... RIP: 0010:__ioremap_caller+0x2c7/0x2e0 ... cp: error reading '/proc/vmcore': Cannot allocate memory kdump: saving vmcore failed In order to fix this bug, let's extend the crash_exclude_mem_range() to handle the overlapping ranges. [ mingo: Amended the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200804044933.1973-3-lijiang@redhat.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
a3e1c3bb24
commit
a2e9a95d21
@ -1157,24 +1157,26 @@ int crash_exclude_mem_range(struct crash_mem *mem,
|
||||
unsigned long long mstart, unsigned long long mend)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i, j;
|
||||
unsigned long long start, end;
|
||||
unsigned long long start, end, p_start, p_end;
|
||||
struct crash_mem_range temp_range = {0, 0};
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < mem->nr_ranges; i++) {
|
||||
start = mem->ranges[i].start;
|
||||
end = mem->ranges[i].end;
|
||||
p_start = mstart;
|
||||
p_end = mend;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mstart > end || mend < start)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Truncate any area outside of range */
|
||||
if (mstart < start)
|
||||
mstart = start;
|
||||
p_start = start;
|
||||
if (mend > end)
|
||||
mend = end;
|
||||
p_end = end;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Found completely overlapping range */
|
||||
if (mstart == start && mend == end) {
|
||||
if (p_start == start && p_end == end) {
|
||||
mem->ranges[i].start = 0;
|
||||
mem->ranges[i].end = 0;
|
||||
if (i < mem->nr_ranges - 1) {
|
||||
@ -1185,20 +1187,29 @@ int crash_exclude_mem_range(struct crash_mem *mem,
|
||||
mem->ranges[j].end =
|
||||
mem->ranges[j+1].end;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Continue to check if there are another overlapping ranges
|
||||
* from the current position because of shifting the above
|
||||
* mem ranges.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
i--;
|
||||
mem->nr_ranges--;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mem->nr_ranges--;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (mstart > start && mend < end) {
|
||||
if (p_start > start && p_end < end) {
|
||||
/* Split original range */
|
||||
mem->ranges[i].end = mstart - 1;
|
||||
temp_range.start = mend + 1;
|
||||
mem->ranges[i].end = p_start - 1;
|
||||
temp_range.start = p_end + 1;
|
||||
temp_range.end = end;
|
||||
} else if (mstart != start)
|
||||
mem->ranges[i].end = mstart - 1;
|
||||
} else if (p_start != start)
|
||||
mem->ranges[i].end = p_start - 1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
mem->ranges[i].start = mend + 1;
|
||||
mem->ranges[i].start = p_end + 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1243,7 +1254,7 @@ int crash_prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_mem *mem, int kernel_map,
|
||||
* kexec-tools creates an extra PT_LOAD phdr for kernel text mapping
|
||||
* area (for example, ffffffff80000000 - ffffffffa0000000 on x86_64).
|
||||
* I think this is required by tools like gdb. So same physical
|
||||
* memory will be mapped in two elf headers. One will contain kernel
|
||||
* memory will be mapped in two elf headers. One will contain kernel
|
||||
* text virtual addresses and other will have __va(physical) addresses.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1270,7 +1281,7 @@ int crash_prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_mem *mem, int kernel_map,
|
||||
ehdr->e_ehsize = sizeof(Elf64_Ehdr);
|
||||
ehdr->e_phentsize = sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Prepare one phdr of type PT_NOTE for each present cpu */
|
||||
/* Prepare one phdr of type PT_NOTE for each present CPU */
|
||||
for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
|
||||
phdr->p_type = PT_NOTE;
|
||||
notes_addr = per_cpu_ptr_to_phys(per_cpu_ptr(crash_notes, cpu));
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user