blk-mq: fold __blk_mq_insert_request into blk_mq_insert_request

There is no good point in keeping the __blk_mq_insert_request around
for two function calls and a singler caller.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230413064057.707578-8-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Hellwig 2023-04-13 08:40:44 +02:00 committed by Jens Axboe
parent 2bd215df79
commit a88db1e000
2 changed files with 2 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -2463,17 +2463,6 @@ static inline void __blk_mq_insert_req_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &ctx->rq_lists[type]);
}
void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
bool at_head)
{
struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = rq->mq_ctx;
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
__blk_mq_insert_req_list(hctx, rq, at_head);
blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(hctx, ctx);
}
/**
* blk_mq_request_bypass_insert - Insert a request at dispatch list.
* @rq: Pointer to request to be inserted.
@ -2598,7 +2587,8 @@ static void blk_mq_insert_request(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
e->type->ops.insert_requests(hctx, &list, at_head);
} else {
spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
__blk_mq_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head);
__blk_mq_insert_req_list(hctx, rq, at_head);
blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(hctx, ctx);
spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}

View File

@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ void blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
/*
* Internal helpers for request insertion into sw queues
*/
void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
bool at_head);
void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
bool run_queue);