mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 16:56:26 +00:00
sched/cpupri: Add CPUPRI_HIGHER
Add CPUPRI_HIGHER above the RT99 priority to denote the CPU is in use by higher priority tasks (specifically deadline). XXX: we should probably drive PUSH-PULL from cpupri, that would automagically result in an RT-PUSH when DL sets cpupri to CPUPRI_HIGHER. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
934fc3314b
commit
b13772f813
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
|
||||
* This code tracks the priority of each CPU so that global migration
|
||||
* decisions are easy to calculate. Each CPU can be in a state as follows:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* (INVALID), NORMAL, RT1, ... RT99
|
||||
* (INVALID), NORMAL, RT1, ... RT99, HIGHER
|
||||
*
|
||||
* going from the lowest priority to the highest. CPUs in the INVALID state
|
||||
* are not eligible for routing. The system maintains this state with
|
||||
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
|
||||
* in that class). Therefore a typical application without affinity
|
||||
* restrictions can find a suitable CPU with O(1) complexity (e.g. two bit
|
||||
* searches). For tasks with affinity restrictions, the algorithm has a
|
||||
* worst case complexity of O(min(100, nr_domcpus)), though the scenario that
|
||||
* worst case complexity of O(min(101, nr_domcpus)), though the scenario that
|
||||
* yields the worst case search is fairly contrived.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#include "sched.h"
|
||||
@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
|
||||
* 50 49 49 50
|
||||
* ...
|
||||
* 99 0 0 99
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 100 100 (CPUPRI_HIGHER)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int convert_prio(int prio)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -54,6 +56,10 @@ static int convert_prio(int prio)
|
||||
case MAX_RT_PRIO-1:
|
||||
cpupri = CPUPRI_NORMAL; /* 0 */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case MAX_RT_PRIO:
|
||||
cpupri = CPUPRI_HIGHER; /* 100 */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return cpupri;
|
||||
@ -195,7 +201,7 @@ int cpupri_find_fitness(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p,
|
||||
* cpupri_set - update the CPU priority setting
|
||||
* @cp: The cpupri context
|
||||
* @cpu: The target CPU
|
||||
* @newpri: The priority (INVALID-RT99) to assign to this CPU
|
||||
* @newpri: The priority (INVALID,NORMAL,RT1-RT99,HIGHER) to assign to this CPU
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: Assumes cpu_rq(cpu)->lock is locked
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
|
||||
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
|
||||
|
||||
#define CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES MAX_RT_PRIO
|
||||
#define CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES (MAX_RT_PRIO+1)
|
||||
|
||||
#define CPUPRI_INVALID -1
|
||||
#define CPUPRI_NORMAL 0
|
||||
/* values 1-99 are for RT1-RT99 priorities */
|
||||
#define CPUPRI_HIGHER 100
|
||||
|
||||
struct cpupri_vec {
|
||||
atomic_t count;
|
||||
|
@ -1394,6 +1394,8 @@ static void inc_dl_deadline(struct dl_rq *dl_rq, u64 deadline)
|
||||
|
||||
if (dl_rq->earliest_dl.curr == 0 ||
|
||||
dl_time_before(deadline, dl_rq->earliest_dl.curr)) {
|
||||
if (dl_rq->earliest_dl.curr == 0)
|
||||
cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, CPUPRI_HIGHER);
|
||||
dl_rq->earliest_dl.curr = deadline;
|
||||
cpudl_set(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu, deadline);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1411,6 +1413,7 @@ static void dec_dl_deadline(struct dl_rq *dl_rq, u64 deadline)
|
||||
dl_rq->earliest_dl.curr = 0;
|
||||
dl_rq->earliest_dl.next = 0;
|
||||
cpudl_clear(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq->cpu);
|
||||
cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio.curr);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
struct rb_node *leftmost = dl_rq->root.rb_leftmost;
|
||||
struct sched_dl_entity *entry;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user