mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 17:25:38 +00:00
mm: mlock: avoid folio_within_range() on KSM pages
Since commitdc68badced
("mm: mlock: update mlock_pte_range to handle large folio") I've just occasionally seen VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_ksm) warnings from folio_within_range(), in a splurge after testing with KSM hyperactive. folio_referenced_one()'s use of folio_within_vma() is safe because it checks folio_test_large() first; but allow_mlock_munlock() needs to do the same to avoid those warnings (or check !folio_test_ksm() itself? Or move either check into folio_within_range()? Hard to tell without more examples of its use). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/23852f6a-5bfa-1ffd-30db-30c5560ad426@google.com Fixes:dc68badced
("mm: mlock: update mlock_pte_range to handle large folio") Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reviewed-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1cbf0a5884
commit
b1454b463c
@ -346,6 +346,10 @@ static inline bool allow_mlock_munlock(struct folio *folio,
|
||||
if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/* folio_within_range() cannot take KSM, but any small folio is OK */
|
||||
if (!folio_test_large(folio))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/* folio not in range [start, end), skip mlock */
|
||||
if (!folio_within_range(folio, vma, start, end))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user