drm/i915: Fix PSR programming

commit 24bd9bf54d45d28089251cdf62bf14323d1aa827 upstream.

| has a higher precedence than ?. Therefore, the calculation doesn't do
at all what you would expect. Thanks to Ken for convincing me that this
was indeed the issue. Send me back to C programmer school, please.

I'm sort of surprised PSR was continuing to work for people. It should
be broken IMO (and it was broken for me, but I had assumed it never
worked).

Regression from:
commit ed8546ac1f99b850879f07b1e9b06b42fb0a36d9
Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 4 22:45:05 2013 -0800

    drm/i915/bdw: Support eDP PSR

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth.w.graunke@intel.com>
Cc: Art Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Reported-by: "Kumar, Kiran S" <kiran.s.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Ben Widawsky 2014-03-04 22:38:10 -08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent de690a4974
commit bab00f228f

View File

@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_DISABLE;
I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL(dev), val |
IS_BROADWELL(dev) ? 0 : link_entry_time |
(IS_BROADWELL(dev) ? 0 : link_entry_time) |
max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT |
idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT |
EDP_PSR_ENABLE);