mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 17:25:38 +00:00
net: ethernet: oa_tc6: fix tx skb race condition between reference pointers
There are two skb pointers to manage tx skb's enqueued from n/w stack.
waiting_tx_skb pointer points to the tx skb which needs to be processed
and ongoing_tx_skb pointer points to the tx skb which is being processed.
SPI thread prepares the tx data chunks from the tx skb pointed by the
ongoing_tx_skb pointer. When the tx skb pointed by the ongoing_tx_skb is
processed, the tx skb pointed by the waiting_tx_skb is assigned to
ongoing_tx_skb and the waiting_tx_skb pointer is assigned with NULL.
Whenever there is a new tx skb from n/w stack, it will be assigned to
waiting_tx_skb pointer if it is NULL. Enqueuing and processing of a tx skb
handled in two different threads.
Consider a scenario where the SPI thread processed an ongoing_tx_skb and
it moves next tx skb from waiting_tx_skb pointer to ongoing_tx_skb pointer
without doing any NULL check. At this time, if the waiting_tx_skb pointer
is NULL then ongoing_tx_skb pointer is also assigned with NULL. After
that, if a new tx skb is assigned to waiting_tx_skb pointer by the n/w
stack and there is a chance to overwrite the tx skb pointer with NULL in
the SPI thread. Finally one of the tx skb will be left as unhandled,
resulting packet missing and memory leak.
- Consider the below scenario where the TXC reported from the previous
transfer is 10 and ongoing_tx_skb holds an tx ethernet frame which can be
transported in 20 TXCs and waiting_tx_skb is still NULL.
tx_credits = 10; /* 21 are filled in the previous transfer */
ongoing_tx_skb = 20;
waiting_tx_skb = NULL; /* Still NULL */
- So, (tc6->ongoing_tx_skb || tc6->waiting_tx_skb) becomes true.
- After oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs()
ongoing_tx_skb = 10;
waiting_tx_skb = NULL; /* Still NULL */
- Perform SPI transfer.
- Process SPI rx buffer to get the TXC from footers.
- Now let's assume previously filled 21 TXCs are freed so we are good to
transport the next remaining 10 tx chunks from ongoing_tx_skb.
tx_credits = 21;
ongoing_tx_skb = 10;
waiting_tx_skb = NULL;
- So, (tc6->ongoing_tx_skb || tc6->waiting_tx_skb) becomes true again.
- In the oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs()
ongoing_tx_skb = NULL;
waiting_tx_skb = NULL;
- Now the below bad case might happen,
Thread1 (oa_tc6_start_xmit) Thread2 (oa_tc6_spi_thread_handler)
--------------------------- -----------------------------------
- if waiting_tx_skb is NULL
- if ongoing_tx_skb is NULL
- ongoing_tx_skb = waiting_tx_skb
- waiting_tx_skb = skb
- waiting_tx_skb = NULL
...
- ongoing_tx_skb = NULL
- if waiting_tx_skb is NULL
- waiting_tx_skb = skb
To overcome the above issue, protect the moving of tx skb reference from
waiting_tx_skb pointer to ongoing_tx_skb pointer and assigning new tx skb
to waiting_tx_skb pointer, so that the other thread can't access the
waiting_tx_skb pointer until the current thread completes moving the tx
skb reference safely.
Fixes: 53fbde8ab2
("net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement transmit path to transfer tx ethernet frames")
Signed-off-by: Parthiban Veerasooran <parthiban.veerasooran@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d2f320e12
commit
e592b5110b
@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct oa_tc6 {
|
||||
struct mii_bus *mdiobus;
|
||||
struct spi_device *spi;
|
||||
struct mutex spi_ctrl_lock; /* Protects spi control transfer */
|
||||
spinlock_t tx_skb_lock; /* Protects tx skb handling */
|
||||
void *spi_ctrl_tx_buf;
|
||||
void *spi_ctrl_rx_buf;
|
||||
void *spi_data_tx_buf;
|
||||
@ -1004,8 +1005,10 @@ static u16 oa_tc6_prepare_spi_tx_buf_for_tx_skbs(struct oa_tc6 *tc6)
|
||||
for (used_tx_credits = 0; used_tx_credits < tc6->tx_credits;
|
||||
used_tx_credits++) {
|
||||
if (!tc6->ongoing_tx_skb) {
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&tc6->tx_skb_lock);
|
||||
tc6->ongoing_tx_skb = tc6->waiting_tx_skb;
|
||||
tc6->waiting_tx_skb = NULL;
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&tc6->tx_skb_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!tc6->ongoing_tx_skb)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -1210,7 +1213,9 @@ netdev_tx_t oa_tc6_start_xmit(struct oa_tc6 *tc6, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&tc6->tx_skb_lock);
|
||||
tc6->waiting_tx_skb = skb;
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&tc6->tx_skb_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wake spi kthread to perform spi transfer */
|
||||
wake_up_interruptible(&tc6->spi_wq);
|
||||
@ -1240,6 +1245,7 @@ struct oa_tc6 *oa_tc6_init(struct spi_device *spi, struct net_device *netdev)
|
||||
tc6->netdev = netdev;
|
||||
SET_NETDEV_DEV(netdev, &spi->dev);
|
||||
mutex_init(&tc6->spi_ctrl_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&tc6->tx_skb_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set the SPI controller to pump at realtime priority */
|
||||
tc6->spi->rt = true;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user