Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Benjamin Tissoires
75839101ce HID: bpf: prevent infinite recursions with hid_hw_raw_requests hooks
When we attach a sleepable hook to hid_hw_raw_requests, we can (and in
many cases should) call ourself hid_bpf_raw_request(), to actually fetch
data from the device itself.

However, this means that we might enter an infinite loop between
hid_hw_raw_requests hooks and hid_bpf_hw_request() call.

To prevent that, if a hid_bpf_hw_request() call is emitted, we prevent
any new call of this kfunc by storing the information in the context.
This way we can always trace/monitor/filter the incoming bpf requests,
while preventing those loops to happen.

I don't think exposing "from_bpf" is very interesting because while
writing such a bpf program, you need to match at least the report number
and/or the source of the call. So a blind "if there is a
hid_hw_raw_request() call, I'm emitting another one" makes no real
sense.

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240626-hid_hw_req_bpf-v2-5-cfd60fb6c79f@kernel.org
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
2024-06-27 11:00:12 +02:00
Benjamin Tissoires
4a86220e04 HID: bpf: remove tracing HID-BPF capability
We can now rely on struct_ops as we cleared the users in-tree.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-hid_bpf_struct_ops-v3-8-6ac6ade58329@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
2024-06-14 11:20:20 +02:00
Benjamin Tissoires
ebc0d8093e HID: bpf: implement HID-BPF through bpf_struct_ops
We do this implementation in several steps to not have the CI failing:
- first (this patch), we add struct_ops while keeping the existing infra
  available
- then we change the selftests, the examples and the existing in-tree
  HID-BPF programs
- then we remove the existing trace points making old HID-BPF obsolete

There are a few advantages of struct_ops over tracing:
- compatibility with sleepable programs (for hid_hw_raw_request() in
  a later patch)
- a lot simpler in the kernel: it's a simple rcu protected list
- we can add more parameters to the function called without much trouble
- the "attach" is now generic through BPF-core: the caller just needs to
  set hid_id and flags before calling __load().
- all the BPF tough part is not handled in BPF-core through generic
  processing
- hid_bpf_ctx is now only writable where it needs be

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-hid_bpf_struct_ops-v3-3-6ac6ade58329@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
2024-06-14 11:20:16 +02:00
Benjamin Tissoires
7cdd210890 HID: bpf: remove double fdget()
When the kfunc hid_bpf_attach_prog() is called, we called twice fdget():
one for fetching the type of the bpf program, and one for actually
attaching the program to the device.

The problem is that between those two calls, we have no guarantees that
the prog_fd is still the same file descriptor for the given program.

Solve this by calling bpf_prog_get() earlier, and use this to fetch the
program type.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAO-hwJJ8vh8JD3-P43L-_CLNmPx0hWj44aom0O838vfP4=_1CA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: f5c27da4e3 ("HID: initial BPF implementation")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124-b4-hid-bpf-fixes-v2-1-052520b1e5e6@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
2024-01-31 10:27:00 +01:00
Benjamin Tissoires
bb2c0aeac1 HID: bpf: clean up entrypoint
We don't need to watch for calls on bpf_prog_put_deferred(), so remove
that from the entrypoints.bpf.c file.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2023-01-18 22:08:38 +01:00
Benjamin Tissoires
ad190df11a HID: bpf: allow to change the report descriptor
Add a new tracepoint hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup() so we can trigger a
report descriptor fixup in the bpf world.

Whenever the program gets attached/detached, the device is reconnected
meaning that userspace will see it disappearing and reappearing with
the new report descriptor.

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2022-11-15 16:28:39 +01:00
Benjamin Tissoires
0baef37335 HID: bpf jmp table: simplify the logic of cleaning up programs
Kind of a hack, but works for now:

Instead of listening for any close of eBPF program, we now
decrement the refcount when we insert it in our internal
map of fd progs.

This is safe to do because:
- we listen to any call of destructor of programs
- when a program is being destroyed, we disable it by removing
  it from any RCU list used by any HID device (so it will never
  be called)
- we then trigger a job to cleanup the prog fd map, but we overwrite
  the removal of the elements to not do anything on the programs, just
  remove the allocated space

This is better than previously because we can remove the map of known
programs and their usage count. We now rely on the refcount of
bpf, which has greater chances of being accurate.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2022-11-15 16:28:29 +01:00
Benjamin Tissoires
f5c27da4e3 HID: initial BPF implementation
Declare an entry point that can use fmod_ret BPF programs, and
also an API to access and change the incoming data.

A simpler implementation would consist in just calling
hid_bpf_device_event() for any incoming event and let users deal
with the fact that they will be called for any event of any device.

The goal of HID-BPF is to partially replace drivers, so this situation
can be problematic because we might have programs which will step on
each other toes.

For that, we add a new API hid_bpf_attach_prog() that can be called
from a syscall and we manually deal with a jump table in hid-bpf.

Whenever we add a program to the jump table (in other words, when we
attach a program to a HID device), we keep the number of time we added
this program in the jump table so we can release it whenever there are
no other users.

HID devices have an RCU protected list of available programs in the
jump table, and those programs are called one after the other thanks
to bpf_tail_call().

To achieve the detection of users losing their fds on the programs we
attached, we add 2 tracing facilities on bpf_prog_release() (for when
a fd is closed) and bpf_free_inode() (for when a pinned program gets
unpinned).

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2022-11-15 16:28:28 +01:00