Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1]. Replace struct ipv6_rpl_sr_hdr's
"segments" union of 0-length arrays with flexible arrays. Detected with
GCC 13, using -fstrict-flex-arrays=3:
In function 'rpl_validate_srh',
inlined from 'rpl_build_state' at ../net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:96:7:
../net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:60:28: warning: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'struct in6_addr[0]' [-Warray-bounds=]
60 | if (ipv6_addr_type(&srh->rpl_segaddr[srh->segments_left - 1]) &
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../include/net/rpl.h:12,
from ../net/ipv6/rpl_iptunnel.c:13:
../include/uapi/linux/rpl.h: In function 'rpl_build_state':
../include/uapi/linux/rpl.h:40:33: note: while referencing 'addr'
40 | struct in6_addr addr[0];
| ^~~~
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230105221533.never.711-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Following RFC 6554 [1], the current order of fields is wrong for big
endian definition. Indeed, here is how the header looks like:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Next Header | Hdr Ext Len | Routing Type | Segments Left |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CmprI | CmprE | Pad | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This patch reorders fields so that big endian definition is now correct.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6554#section-3
Fixes: cfa933d938d8 ("include: uapi: linux: add rpl sr header definition")
Signed-off-by: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This patch adds a uapi header for rpl struct definition. The segments
data can be accessed over rpl_segaddr or rpl_segdata macros. In case of
compri and compre is zero the segment data is not compressed and can be
accessed by rpl_segaddr. In the other case the compressed data can be
accessed by rpl_segdata and interpreted as byte array.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>