mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 09:16:33 +00:00
894d1b3db4
In preparation to nest mutex::wait_lock under rq::lock we need to remove wakeups from under it. Do this by utilizing wake_qs to defer the wakeup until after the lock is dropped. [Heavily changed after55f036ca7e
("locking: WW mutex cleanup") and08295b3b5b
("locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes")] [jstultz: rebased to mainline, added extra wake_up_q & init to avoid hangs, similar to Connor's rework of this patch] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Tested-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241009235352.1614323-2-jstultz@google.com
1274 lines
34 KiB
C
1274 lines
34 KiB
C
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched/task.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "futex.h"
|
|
#include "../locking/rtmutex_common.h"
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* PI code:
|
|
*/
|
|
int refill_pi_state_cache(void)
|
|
{
|
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state;
|
|
|
|
if (likely(current->pi_state_cache))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
pi_state = kzalloc(sizeof(*pi_state), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!pi_state)
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pi_state->list);
|
|
/* pi_mutex gets initialized later */
|
|
pi_state->owner = NULL;
|
|
refcount_set(&pi_state->refcount, 1);
|
|
pi_state->key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
|
|
|
|
current->pi_state_cache = pi_state;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static struct futex_pi_state *alloc_pi_state(void)
|
|
{
|
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = current->pi_state_cache;
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!pi_state);
|
|
current->pi_state_cache = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return pi_state;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void pi_state_update_owner(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state,
|
|
struct task_struct *new_owner)
|
|
{
|
|
struct task_struct *old_owner = pi_state->owner;
|
|
|
|
lockdep_assert_held(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
|
|
if (old_owner) {
|
|
raw_spin_lock(&old_owner->pi_lock);
|
|
WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list));
|
|
list_del_init(&pi_state->list);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock(&old_owner->pi_lock);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (new_owner) {
|
|
raw_spin_lock(&new_owner->pi_lock);
|
|
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list));
|
|
list_add(&pi_state->list, &new_owner->pi_state_list);
|
|
pi_state->owner = new_owner;
|
|
raw_spin_unlock(&new_owner->pi_lock);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void get_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
|
|
{
|
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_inc_not_zero(&pi_state->refcount));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Drops a reference to the pi_state object and frees or caches it
|
|
* when the last reference is gone.
|
|
*/
|
|
void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
|
|
{
|
|
if (!pi_state)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&pi_state->refcount))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If pi_state->owner is NULL, the owner is most probably dying
|
|
* and has cleaned up the pi_state already
|
|
*/
|
|
if (pi_state->owner) {
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, flags);
|
|
pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, NULL);
|
|
rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (current->pi_state_cache) {
|
|
kfree(pi_state);
|
|
} else {
|
|
/*
|
|
* pi_state->list is already empty.
|
|
* clear pi_state->owner.
|
|
* refcount is at 0 - put it back to 1.
|
|
*/
|
|
pi_state->owner = NULL;
|
|
refcount_set(&pi_state->refcount, 1);
|
|
current->pi_state_cache = pi_state;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We need to check the following states:
|
|
*
|
|
* Waiter | pi_state | pi->owner | uTID | uODIED | ?
|
|
*
|
|
* [1] NULL | --- | --- | 0 | 0/1 | Valid
|
|
* [2] NULL | --- | --- | >0 | 0/1 | Valid
|
|
*
|
|
* [3] Found | NULL | -- | Any | 0/1 | Invalid
|
|
*
|
|
* [4] Found | Found | NULL | 0 | 1 | Valid
|
|
* [5] Found | Found | NULL | >0 | 1 | Invalid
|
|
*
|
|
* [6] Found | Found | task | 0 | 1 | Valid
|
|
*
|
|
* [7] Found | Found | NULL | Any | 0 | Invalid
|
|
*
|
|
* [8] Found | Found | task | ==taskTID | 0/1 | Valid
|
|
* [9] Found | Found | task | 0 | 0 | Invalid
|
|
* [10] Found | Found | task | !=taskTID | 0/1 | Invalid
|
|
*
|
|
* [1] Indicates that the kernel can acquire the futex atomically. We
|
|
* came here due to a stale FUTEX_WAITERS/FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit.
|
|
*
|
|
* [2] Valid, if TID does not belong to a kernel thread. If no matching
|
|
* thread is found then it indicates that the owner TID has died.
|
|
*
|
|
* [3] Invalid. The waiter is queued on a non PI futex
|
|
*
|
|
* [4] Valid state after exit_robust_list(), which sets the user space
|
|
* value to FUTEX_WAITERS | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED.
|
|
*
|
|
* [5] The user space value got manipulated between exit_robust_list()
|
|
* and exit_pi_state_list()
|
|
*
|
|
* [6] Valid state after exit_pi_state_list() which sets the new owner in
|
|
* the pi_state but cannot access the user space value.
|
|
*
|
|
* [7] pi_state->owner can only be NULL when the OWNER_DIED bit is set.
|
|
*
|
|
* [8] Owner and user space value match
|
|
*
|
|
* [9] There is no transient state which sets the user space TID to 0
|
|
* except exit_robust_list(), but this is indicated by the
|
|
* FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit. See [4]
|
|
*
|
|
* [10] There is no transient state which leaves owner and user space
|
|
* TID out of sync. Except one error case where the kernel is denied
|
|
* write access to the user address, see fixup_pi_state_owner().
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
* Serialization and lifetime rules:
|
|
*
|
|
* hb->lock:
|
|
*
|
|
* hb -> futex_q, relation
|
|
* futex_q -> pi_state, relation
|
|
*
|
|
* (cannot be raw because hb can contain arbitrary amount
|
|
* of futex_q's)
|
|
*
|
|
* pi_mutex->wait_lock:
|
|
*
|
|
* {uval, pi_state}
|
|
*
|
|
* (and pi_mutex 'obviously')
|
|
*
|
|
* p->pi_lock:
|
|
*
|
|
* p->pi_state_list -> pi_state->list, relation
|
|
* pi_mutex->owner -> pi_state->owner, relation
|
|
*
|
|
* pi_state->refcount:
|
|
*
|
|
* pi_state lifetime
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
* Lock order:
|
|
*
|
|
* hb->lock
|
|
* pi_mutex->wait_lock
|
|
* p->pi_lock
|
|
*
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Validate that the existing waiter has a pi_state and sanity check
|
|
* the pi_state against the user space value. If correct, attach to
|
|
* it.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int attach_to_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval,
|
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state,
|
|
struct futex_pi_state **ps)
|
|
{
|
|
pid_t pid = uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK;
|
|
u32 uval2;
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Userspace might have messed up non-PI and PI futexes [3]
|
|
*/
|
|
if (unlikely(!pi_state))
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We get here with hb->lock held, and having found a
|
|
* futex_top_waiter(). This means that futex_lock_pi() of said futex_q
|
|
* has dropped the hb->lock in between futex_queue() and futex_unqueue_pi(),
|
|
* which in turn means that futex_lock_pi() still has a reference on
|
|
* our pi_state.
|
|
*
|
|
* The waiter holding a reference on @pi_state also protects against
|
|
* the unlocked put_pi_state() in futex_unlock_pi(), futex_lock_pi()
|
|
* and futex_wait_requeue_pi() as it cannot go to 0 and consequently
|
|
* free pi_state before we can take a reference ourselves.
|
|
*/
|
|
WARN_ON(!refcount_read(&pi_state->refcount));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now that we have a pi_state, we can acquire wait_lock
|
|
* and do the state validation.
|
|
*/
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Since {uval, pi_state} is serialized by wait_lock, and our current
|
|
* uval was read without holding it, it can have changed. Verify it
|
|
* still is what we expect it to be, otherwise retry the entire
|
|
* operation.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval2, uaddr))
|
|
goto out_efault;
|
|
|
|
if (uval != uval2)
|
|
goto out_eagain;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Handle the owner died case:
|
|
*/
|
|
if (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* exit_pi_state_list sets owner to NULL and wakes the
|
|
* topmost waiter. The task which acquires the
|
|
* pi_state->rt_mutex will fixup owner.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!pi_state->owner) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* No pi state owner, but the user space TID
|
|
* is not 0. Inconsistent state. [5]
|
|
*/
|
|
if (pid)
|
|
goto out_einval;
|
|
/*
|
|
* Take a ref on the state and return success. [4]
|
|
*/
|
|
goto out_attach;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If TID is 0, then either the dying owner has not
|
|
* yet executed exit_pi_state_list() or some waiter
|
|
* acquired the rtmutex in the pi state, but did not
|
|
* yet fixup the TID in user space.
|
|
*
|
|
* Take a ref on the state and return success. [6]
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!pid)
|
|
goto out_attach;
|
|
} else {
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the owner died bit is not set, then the pi_state
|
|
* must have an owner. [7]
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!pi_state->owner)
|
|
goto out_einval;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Bail out if user space manipulated the futex value. If pi
|
|
* state exists then the owner TID must be the same as the
|
|
* user space TID. [9/10]
|
|
*/
|
|
if (pid != task_pid_vnr(pi_state->owner))
|
|
goto out_einval;
|
|
|
|
out_attach:
|
|
get_pi_state(pi_state);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
*ps = pi_state;
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
out_einval:
|
|
ret = -EINVAL;
|
|
goto out_error;
|
|
|
|
out_eagain:
|
|
ret = -EAGAIN;
|
|
goto out_error;
|
|
|
|
out_efault:
|
|
ret = -EFAULT;
|
|
goto out_error;
|
|
|
|
out_error:
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int handle_exit_race(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval,
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
{
|
|
u32 uval2;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the futex exit state is not yet FUTEX_STATE_DEAD, tell the
|
|
* caller that the alleged owner is busy.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (tsk && tsk->futex_state != FUTEX_STATE_DEAD)
|
|
return -EBUSY;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Reread the user space value to handle the following situation:
|
|
*
|
|
* CPU0 CPU1
|
|
*
|
|
* sys_exit() sys_futex()
|
|
* do_exit() futex_lock_pi()
|
|
* futex_lock_pi_atomic()
|
|
* exit_signals(tsk) No waiters:
|
|
* tsk->flags |= PF_EXITING; *uaddr == 0x00000PID
|
|
* mm_release(tsk) Set waiter bit
|
|
* exit_robust_list(tsk) { *uaddr = 0x80000PID;
|
|
* Set owner died attach_to_pi_owner() {
|
|
* *uaddr = 0xC0000000; tsk = get_task(PID);
|
|
* } if (!tsk->flags & PF_EXITING) {
|
|
* ... attach();
|
|
* tsk->futex_state = } else {
|
|
* FUTEX_STATE_DEAD; if (tsk->futex_state !=
|
|
* FUTEX_STATE_DEAD)
|
|
* return -EAGAIN;
|
|
* return -ESRCH; <--- FAIL
|
|
* }
|
|
*
|
|
* Returning ESRCH unconditionally is wrong here because the
|
|
* user space value has been changed by the exiting task.
|
|
*
|
|
* The same logic applies to the case where the exiting task is
|
|
* already gone.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval2, uaddr))
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
/* If the user space value has changed, try again. */
|
|
if (uval2 != uval)
|
|
return -EAGAIN;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The exiting task did not have a robust list, the robust list was
|
|
* corrupted or the user space value in *uaddr is simply bogus.
|
|
* Give up and tell user space.
|
|
*/
|
|
return -ESRCH;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void __attach_to_pi_owner(struct task_struct *p, union futex_key *key,
|
|
struct futex_pi_state **ps)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* No existing pi state. First waiter. [2]
|
|
*
|
|
* This creates pi_state, we have hb->lock held, this means nothing can
|
|
* observe this state, wait_lock is irrelevant.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = alloc_pi_state();
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Initialize the pi_mutex in locked state and make @p
|
|
* the owner of it:
|
|
*/
|
|
rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(&pi_state->pi_mutex, p);
|
|
|
|
/* Store the key for possible exit cleanups: */
|
|
pi_state->key = *key;
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&pi_state->list));
|
|
list_add(&pi_state->list, &p->pi_state_list);
|
|
/*
|
|
* Assignment without holding pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock is safe
|
|
* because there is no concurrency as the object is not published yet.
|
|
*/
|
|
pi_state->owner = p;
|
|
|
|
*ps = pi_state;
|
|
}
|
|
/*
|
|
* Lookup the task for the TID provided from user space and attach to
|
|
* it after doing proper sanity checks.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int attach_to_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, union futex_key *key,
|
|
struct futex_pi_state **ps,
|
|
struct task_struct **exiting)
|
|
{
|
|
pid_t pid = uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK;
|
|
struct task_struct *p;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We are the first waiter - try to look up the real owner and attach
|
|
* the new pi_state to it, but bail out when TID = 0 [1]
|
|
*
|
|
* The !pid check is paranoid. None of the call sites should end up
|
|
* with pid == 0, but better safe than sorry. Let the caller retry
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!pid)
|
|
return -EAGAIN;
|
|
p = find_get_task_by_vpid(pid);
|
|
if (!p)
|
|
return handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, NULL);
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
|
|
put_task_struct(p);
|
|
return -EPERM;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We need to look at the task state to figure out, whether the
|
|
* task is exiting. To protect against the change of the task state
|
|
* in futex_exit_release(), we do this protected by p->pi_lock:
|
|
*/
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
|
|
if (unlikely(p->futex_state != FUTEX_STATE_OK)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* The task is on the way out. When the futex state is
|
|
* FUTEX_STATE_DEAD, we know that the task has finished
|
|
* the cleanup:
|
|
*/
|
|
int ret = handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, p);
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the owner task is between FUTEX_STATE_EXITING and
|
|
* FUTEX_STATE_DEAD then store the task pointer and keep
|
|
* the reference on the task struct. The calling code will
|
|
* drop all locks, wait for the task to reach
|
|
* FUTEX_STATE_DEAD and then drop the refcount. This is
|
|
* required to prevent a live lock when the current task
|
|
* preempted the exiting task between the two states.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (ret == -EBUSY)
|
|
*exiting = p;
|
|
else
|
|
put_task_struct(p);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
__attach_to_pi_owner(p, key, ps);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
|
|
|
|
put_task_struct(p);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int lock_pi_update_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, u32 newval)
|
|
{
|
|
int err;
|
|
u32 curval;
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
err = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval);
|
|
if (unlikely(err))
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
/* If user space value changed, let the caller retry */
|
|
return curval != uval ? -EAGAIN : 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* futex_lock_pi_atomic() - Atomic work required to acquire a pi aware futex
|
|
* @uaddr: the pi futex user address
|
|
* @hb: the pi futex hash bucket
|
|
* @key: the futex key associated with uaddr and hb
|
|
* @ps: the pi_state pointer where we store the result of the
|
|
* lookup
|
|
* @task: the task to perform the atomic lock work for. This will
|
|
* be "current" except in the case of requeue pi.
|
|
* @exiting: Pointer to store the task pointer of the owner task
|
|
* which is in the middle of exiting
|
|
* @set_waiters: force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit (1) or not (0)
|
|
*
|
|
* Return:
|
|
* - 0 - ready to wait;
|
|
* - 1 - acquired the lock;
|
|
* - <0 - error
|
|
*
|
|
* The hb->lock must be held by the caller.
|
|
*
|
|
* @exiting is only set when the return value is -EBUSY. If so, this holds
|
|
* a refcount on the exiting task on return and the caller needs to drop it
|
|
* after waiting for the exit to complete.
|
|
*/
|
|
int futex_lock_pi_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
|
|
union futex_key *key,
|
|
struct futex_pi_state **ps,
|
|
struct task_struct *task,
|
|
struct task_struct **exiting,
|
|
int set_waiters)
|
|
{
|
|
u32 uval, newval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(task);
|
|
struct futex_q *top_waiter;
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Read the user space value first so we can validate a few
|
|
* things before proceeding further.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr))
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Detect deadlocks.
|
|
*/
|
|
if ((unlikely((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) == vpid)))
|
|
return -EDEADLK;
|
|
|
|
if ((unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))))
|
|
return -EDEADLK;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Lookup existing state first. If it exists, try to attach to
|
|
* its pi_state.
|
|
*/
|
|
top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb, key);
|
|
if (top_waiter)
|
|
return attach_to_pi_state(uaddr, uval, top_waiter->pi_state, ps);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* No waiter and user TID is 0. We are here because the
|
|
* waiters or the owner died bit is set or called from
|
|
* requeue_cmp_pi or for whatever reason something took the
|
|
* syscall.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!(uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* We take over the futex. No other waiters and the user space
|
|
* TID is 0. We preserve the owner died bit.
|
|
*/
|
|
newval = uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED;
|
|
newval |= vpid;
|
|
|
|
/* The futex requeue_pi code can enforce the waiters bit */
|
|
if (set_waiters)
|
|
newval |= FUTEX_WAITERS;
|
|
|
|
ret = lock_pi_update_atomic(uaddr, uval, newval);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the waiter bit was requested the caller also needs PI
|
|
* state attached to the new owner of the user space futex.
|
|
*
|
|
* @task is guaranteed to be alive and it cannot be exiting
|
|
* because it is either sleeping or waiting in
|
|
* futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync().
|
|
*
|
|
* No need to do the full attach_to_pi_owner() exercise
|
|
* because @task is known and valid.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (set_waiters) {
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
|
|
__attach_to_pi_owner(task, key, ps);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
|
|
}
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* First waiter. Set the waiters bit before attaching ourself to
|
|
* the owner. If owner tries to unlock, it will be forced into
|
|
* the kernel and blocked on hb->lock.
|
|
*/
|
|
newval = uval | FUTEX_WAITERS;
|
|
ret = lock_pi_update_atomic(uaddr, uval, newval);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the update of the user space value succeeded, we try to
|
|
* attach to the owner. If that fails, no harm done, we only
|
|
* set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit in the user space variable.
|
|
*/
|
|
return attach_to_pi_owner(uaddr, newval, key, ps, exiting);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Caller must hold a reference on @pi_state.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval,
|
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state,
|
|
struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter)
|
|
{
|
|
struct task_struct *new_owner;
|
|
bool postunlock = false;
|
|
DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh);
|
|
u32 curval, newval;
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
new_owner = top_waiter->task;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We pass it to the next owner. The WAITERS bit is always kept
|
|
* enabled while there is PI state around. We cleanup the owner
|
|
* died bit, because we are the owner.
|
|
*/
|
|
newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner);
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true))) {
|
|
ret = -EFAULT;
|
|
goto out_unlock;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval);
|
|
if (!ret && (curval != uval)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* If a unconditional UNLOCK_PI operation (user space did not
|
|
* try the TID->0 transition) raced with a waiter setting the
|
|
* FUTEX_WAITERS flag between get_user() and locking the hash
|
|
* bucket lock, retry the operation.
|
|
*/
|
|
if ((FUTEX_TID_MASK & curval) == uval)
|
|
ret = -EAGAIN;
|
|
else
|
|
ret = -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!ret) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* This is a point of no return; once we modified the uval
|
|
* there is no going back and subsequent operations must
|
|
* not fail.
|
|
*/
|
|
pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, new_owner);
|
|
postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wqh);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
out_unlock:
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
|
|
if (postunlock)
|
|
rt_mutex_postunlock(&wqh);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int __fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q,
|
|
struct task_struct *argowner)
|
|
{
|
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state;
|
|
struct task_struct *oldowner, *newowner;
|
|
u32 uval, curval, newval, newtid;
|
|
int err = 0;
|
|
|
|
oldowner = pi_state->owner;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We are here because either:
|
|
*
|
|
* - we stole the lock and pi_state->owner needs updating to reflect
|
|
* that (@argowner == current),
|
|
*
|
|
* or:
|
|
*
|
|
* - someone stole our lock and we need to fix things to point to the
|
|
* new owner (@argowner == NULL).
|
|
*
|
|
* Either way, we have to replace the TID in the user space variable.
|
|
* This must be atomic as we have to preserve the owner died bit here.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note: We write the user space value _before_ changing the pi_state
|
|
* because we can fault here. Imagine swapped out pages or a fork
|
|
* that marked all the anonymous memory readonly for cow.
|
|
*
|
|
* Modifying pi_state _before_ the user space value would leave the
|
|
* pi_state in an inconsistent state when we fault here, because we
|
|
* need to drop the locks to handle the fault. This might be observed
|
|
* in the PID checks when attaching to PI state .
|
|
*/
|
|
retry:
|
|
if (!argowner) {
|
|
if (oldowner != current) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* We raced against a concurrent self; things are
|
|
* already fixed up. Nothing to do.
|
|
*/
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (__rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&pi_state->pi_mutex)) {
|
|
/* We got the lock. pi_state is correct. Tell caller. */
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The trylock just failed, so either there is an owner or
|
|
* there is a higher priority waiter than this one.
|
|
*/
|
|
newowner = rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the higher priority waiter has not yet taken over the
|
|
* rtmutex then newowner is NULL. We can't return here with
|
|
* that state because it's inconsistent vs. the user space
|
|
* state. So drop the locks and try again. It's a valid
|
|
* situation and not any different from the other retry
|
|
* conditions.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (unlikely(!newowner)) {
|
|
err = -EAGAIN;
|
|
goto handle_err;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(argowner != current);
|
|
if (oldowner == current) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* We raced against a concurrent self; things are
|
|
* already fixed up. Nothing to do.
|
|
*/
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
newowner = argowner;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
newtid = task_pid_vnr(newowner) | FUTEX_WAITERS;
|
|
/* Owner died? */
|
|
if (!pi_state->owner)
|
|
newtid |= FUTEX_OWNER_DIED;
|
|
|
|
err = futex_get_value_locked(&uval, uaddr);
|
|
if (err)
|
|
goto handle_err;
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
newval = (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) | newtid;
|
|
|
|
err = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval);
|
|
if (err)
|
|
goto handle_err;
|
|
|
|
if (curval == uval)
|
|
break;
|
|
uval = curval;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We fixed up user space. Now we need to fix the pi_state
|
|
* itself.
|
|
*/
|
|
pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, newowner);
|
|
|
|
return argowner == current;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* In order to reschedule or handle a page fault, we need to drop the
|
|
* locks here. In the case of a fault, this gives the other task
|
|
* (either the highest priority waiter itself or the task which stole
|
|
* the rtmutex) the chance to try the fixup of the pi_state. So once we
|
|
* are back from handling the fault we need to check the pi_state after
|
|
* reacquiring the locks and before trying to do another fixup. When
|
|
* the fixup has been done already we simply return.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note: we hold both hb->lock and pi_mutex->wait_lock. We can safely
|
|
* drop hb->lock since the caller owns the hb -> futex_q relation.
|
|
* Dropping the pi_mutex->wait_lock requires the state revalidate.
|
|
*/
|
|
handle_err:
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
spin_unlock(q->lock_ptr);
|
|
|
|
switch (err) {
|
|
case -EFAULT:
|
|
err = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr);
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case -EAGAIN:
|
|
cond_resched();
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(q->lock_ptr);
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Check if someone else fixed it for us:
|
|
*/
|
|
if (pi_state->owner != oldowner)
|
|
return argowner == current;
|
|
|
|
/* Retry if err was -EAGAIN or the fault in succeeded */
|
|
if (!err)
|
|
goto retry;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* fault_in_user_writeable() failed so user state is immutable. At
|
|
* best we can make the kernel state consistent but user state will
|
|
* be most likely hosed and any subsequent unlock operation will be
|
|
* rejected due to PI futex rule [10].
|
|
*
|
|
* Ensure that the rtmutex owner is also the pi_state owner despite
|
|
* the user space value claiming something different. There is no
|
|
* point in unlocking the rtmutex if current is the owner as it
|
|
* would need to wait until the next waiter has taken the rtmutex
|
|
* to guarantee consistent state. Keep it simple. Userspace asked
|
|
* for this wreckaged state.
|
|
*
|
|
* The rtmutex has an owner - either current or some other
|
|
* task. See the EAGAIN loop above.
|
|
*/
|
|
pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex));
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q,
|
|
struct task_struct *argowner)
|
|
{
|
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = q->pi_state;
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr);
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
ret = __fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, argowner);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* fixup_pi_owner() - Post lock pi_state and corner case management
|
|
* @uaddr: user address of the futex
|
|
* @q: futex_q (contains pi_state and access to the rt_mutex)
|
|
* @locked: if the attempt to take the rt_mutex succeeded (1) or not (0)
|
|
*
|
|
* After attempting to lock an rt_mutex, this function is called to cleanup
|
|
* the pi_state owner as well as handle race conditions that may allow us to
|
|
* acquire the lock. Must be called with the hb lock held.
|
|
*
|
|
* Return:
|
|
* - 1 - success, lock taken;
|
|
* - 0 - success, lock not taken;
|
|
* - <0 - on error (-EFAULT)
|
|
*/
|
|
int fixup_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
|
|
{
|
|
if (locked) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* Got the lock. We might not be the anticipated owner if we
|
|
* did a lock-steal - fix up the PI-state in that case:
|
|
*
|
|
* Speculative pi_state->owner read (we don't hold wait_lock);
|
|
* since we own the lock pi_state->owner == current is the
|
|
* stable state, anything else needs more attention.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (q->pi_state->owner != current)
|
|
return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current);
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If we didn't get the lock; check if anybody stole it from us. In
|
|
* that case, we need to fix up the uval to point to them instead of
|
|
* us, otherwise bad things happen. [10]
|
|
*
|
|
* Another speculative read; pi_state->owner == current is unstable
|
|
* but needs our attention.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (q->pi_state->owner == current)
|
|
return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, NULL);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Paranoia check. If we did not take the lock, then we should not be
|
|
* the owner of the rt_mutex. Warn and establish consistent state.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rt_mutex_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex) == current))
|
|
return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Userspace tried a 0 -> TID atomic transition of the futex value
|
|
* and failed. The kernel side here does the whole locking operation:
|
|
* if there are waiters then it will block as a consequence of relying
|
|
* on rt-mutexes, it does PI, etc. (Due to races the kernel might see
|
|
* a 0 value of the futex too.).
|
|
*
|
|
* Also serves as futex trylock_pi()'ing, and due semantics.
|
|
*/
|
|
int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int trylock)
|
|
{
|
|
struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to;
|
|
struct task_struct *exiting = NULL;
|
|
struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter;
|
|
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
|
|
struct futex_q q = futex_q_init;
|
|
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
|
|
int res, ret;
|
|
|
|
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI))
|
|
return -ENOSYS;
|
|
|
|
if (refill_pi_state_cache())
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
to = futex_setup_timer(time, &timeout, flags, 0);
|
|
|
|
retry:
|
|
ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, flags, &q.key, FUTEX_WRITE);
|
|
if (unlikely(ret != 0))
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
retry_private:
|
|
hb = futex_q_lock(&q);
|
|
|
|
ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(uaddr, hb, &q.key, &q.pi_state, current,
|
|
&exiting, 0);
|
|
if (unlikely(ret)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* Atomic work succeeded and we got the lock,
|
|
* or failed. Either way, we do _not_ block.
|
|
*/
|
|
switch (ret) {
|
|
case 1:
|
|
/* We got the lock. */
|
|
ret = 0;
|
|
goto out_unlock_put_key;
|
|
case -EFAULT:
|
|
goto uaddr_faulted;
|
|
case -EBUSY:
|
|
case -EAGAIN:
|
|
/*
|
|
* Two reasons for this:
|
|
* - EBUSY: Task is exiting and we just wait for the
|
|
* exit to complete.
|
|
* - EAGAIN: The user space value changed.
|
|
*/
|
|
futex_q_unlock(hb);
|
|
/*
|
|
* Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of
|
|
* exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise
|
|
* this task might loop forever, aka. live lock.
|
|
*/
|
|
wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting);
|
|
cond_resched();
|
|
goto retry;
|
|
default:
|
|
goto out_unlock_put_key;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!q.pi_state);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Only actually queue now that the atomic ops are done:
|
|
*/
|
|
__futex_queue(&q, hb);
|
|
|
|
if (trylock) {
|
|
ret = rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
|
|
/* Fixup the trylock return value: */
|
|
ret = ret ? 0 : -EWOULDBLOCK;
|
|
goto no_block;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Must be done before we enqueue the waiter, here is unfortunately
|
|
* under the hb lock, but that *should* work because it does nothing.
|
|
*/
|
|
rt_mutex_pre_schedule();
|
|
|
|
rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* On PREEMPT_RT, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not
|
|
* hold it while doing rt_mutex_start_proxy(), because then it will
|
|
* include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even through we'll not in
|
|
* fact hold it while blocking. This will lead it to report -EDEADLK
|
|
* and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this.
|
|
*
|
|
* Therefore acquire wait_lock while holding hb->lock, but drop the
|
|
* latter before calling __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This
|
|
* interleaves with futex_unlock_pi() -- which does a similar lock
|
|
* handoff -- such that the latter can observe the futex_q::pi_state
|
|
* before __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() is done.
|
|
*/
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
|
|
/*
|
|
* __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() unconditionally enqueues the @rt_waiter
|
|
* such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when
|
|
* it sees the futex_q::pi_state.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current, &wake_q);
|
|
preempt_disable();
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
|
|
preempt_enable();
|
|
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
if (ret == 1)
|
|
ret = 0;
|
|
goto cleanup;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(to))
|
|
hrtimer_sleeper_start_expires(to, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
|
|
|
|
ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
|
|
|
|
cleanup:
|
|
/*
|
|
* If we failed to acquire the lock (deadlock/signal/timeout), we must
|
|
* must unwind the above, however we canont lock hb->lock because
|
|
* rt_mutex already has a waiter enqueued and hb->lock can itself try
|
|
* and enqueue an rt_waiter through rtlock.
|
|
*
|
|
* Doing the cleanup without holding hb->lock can cause inconsistent
|
|
* state between hb and pi_state, but only in the direction of not
|
|
* seeing a waiter that is leaving.
|
|
*
|
|
* See futex_unlock_pi(), it deals with this inconsistency.
|
|
*
|
|
* There be dragons here, since we must deal with the inconsistency on
|
|
* the way out (here), it is impossible to detect/warn about the race
|
|
* the other way around (missing an incoming waiter).
|
|
*
|
|
* What could possibly go wrong...
|
|
*/
|
|
if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter))
|
|
ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now that the rt_waiter has been dequeued, it is safe to use
|
|
* spinlock/rtlock (which might enqueue its own rt_waiter) and fix up
|
|
* the
|
|
*/
|
|
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
|
|
/*
|
|
* Waiter is unqueued.
|
|
*/
|
|
rt_mutex_post_schedule();
|
|
no_block:
|
|
/*
|
|
* Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we
|
|
* haven't already.
|
|
*/
|
|
res = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr, &q, !ret);
|
|
/*
|
|
* If fixup_pi_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it acquired
|
|
* the lock, clear our -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (res)
|
|
ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
|
|
|
|
futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
|
|
spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
out_unlock_put_key:
|
|
futex_q_unlock(hb);
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
if (to) {
|
|
hrtimer_cancel(&to->timer);
|
|
destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&to->timer);
|
|
}
|
|
return ret != -EINTR ? ret : -ERESTARTNOINTR;
|
|
|
|
uaddr_faulted:
|
|
futex_q_unlock(hb);
|
|
|
|
ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED))
|
|
goto retry_private;
|
|
|
|
goto retry;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Userspace attempted a TID -> 0 atomic transition, and failed.
|
|
* This is the in-kernel slowpath: we look up the PI state (if any),
|
|
* and do the rt-mutex unlock.
|
|
*/
|
|
int futex_unlock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags)
|
|
{
|
|
u32 curval, uval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(current);
|
|
union futex_key key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
|
|
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
|
|
struct futex_q *top_waiter;
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI))
|
|
return -ENOSYS;
|
|
|
|
retry:
|
|
if (get_user(uval, uaddr))
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
/*
|
|
* We release only a lock we actually own:
|
|
*/
|
|
if ((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) != vpid)
|
|
return -EPERM;
|
|
|
|
ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, flags, &key, FUTEX_WRITE);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
hb = futex_hash(&key);
|
|
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
|
|
retry_hb:
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Check waiters first. We do not trust user space values at
|
|
* all and we at least want to know if user space fiddled
|
|
* with the futex value instead of blindly unlocking.
|
|
*/
|
|
top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb, &key);
|
|
if (top_waiter) {
|
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = top_waiter->pi_state;
|
|
struct rt_mutex_waiter *rt_waiter;
|
|
|
|
ret = -EINVAL;
|
|
if (!pi_state)
|
|
goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If current does not own the pi_state then the futex is
|
|
* inconsistent and user space fiddled with the futex value.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (pi_state->owner != current)
|
|
goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* By taking wait_lock while still holding hb->lock, we ensure
|
|
* there is no point where we hold neither; and thereby
|
|
* wake_futex_pi() must observe any new waiters.
|
|
*
|
|
* Since the cleanup: case in futex_lock_pi() removes the
|
|
* rt_waiter without holding hb->lock, it is possible for
|
|
* wake_futex_pi() to not find a waiter while the above does,
|
|
* in this case the waiter is on the way out and it can be
|
|
* ignored.
|
|
*
|
|
* In particular; this forces __rt_mutex_start_proxy() to
|
|
* complete such that we're guaranteed to observe the
|
|
* rt_waiter.
|
|
*/
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Futex vs rt_mutex waiter state -- if there are no rt_mutex
|
|
* waiters even though futex thinks there are, then the waiter
|
|
* is leaving. The entry needs to be removed from the list so a
|
|
* new futex_lock_pi() is not using this stale PI-state while
|
|
* the futex is available in user space again.
|
|
* There can be more than one task on its way out so it needs
|
|
* to retry.
|
|
*/
|
|
rt_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
|
|
if (!rt_waiter) {
|
|
__futex_unqueue(top_waiter);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
|
goto retry_hb;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
get_pi_state(pi_state);
|
|
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
|
|
|
/* drops pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock */
|
|
ret = wake_futex_pi(uaddr, uval, pi_state, rt_waiter);
|
|
|
|
put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Success, we're done! No tricky corner cases.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
/*
|
|
* The atomic access to the futex value generated a
|
|
* pagefault, so retry the user-access and the wakeup:
|
|
*/
|
|
if (ret == -EFAULT)
|
|
goto pi_faulted;
|
|
/*
|
|
* A unconditional UNLOCK_PI op raced against a waiter
|
|
* setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit. Try again.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (ret == -EAGAIN)
|
|
goto pi_retry;
|
|
/*
|
|
* wake_futex_pi has detected invalid state. Tell user
|
|
* space.
|
|
*/
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We have no kernel internal state, i.e. no waiters in the
|
|
* kernel. Waiters which are about to queue themselves are stuck
|
|
* on hb->lock. So we can safely ignore them. We do neither
|
|
* preserve the WAITERS bit not the OWNER_DIED one. We are the
|
|
* owner.
|
|
*/
|
|
if ((ret = futex_cmpxchg_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, 0))) {
|
|
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
|
switch (ret) {
|
|
case -EFAULT:
|
|
goto pi_faulted;
|
|
|
|
case -EAGAIN:
|
|
goto pi_retry;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If uval has changed, let user space handle it.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = (curval == uval) ? 0 : -EAGAIN;
|
|
|
|
out_unlock:
|
|
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
pi_retry:
|
|
cond_resched();
|
|
goto retry;
|
|
|
|
pi_faulted:
|
|
|
|
ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr);
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
goto retry;
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|