mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 17:23:36 +00:00
ARM: 9233/1: stacktrace: Skip frame pointer boundary check for call_with_stack()
When using the frame pointer unwinder, it was found that the stack trace output of stack_trace_save() is incomplete if the stack contains call_with_stack(): [0x7f00002c] dump_stack_task+0x2c/0x90 [hrtimer] [0x7f0000a0] hrtimer_hander+0x10/0x18 [hrtimer] [0x801a67f0] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1b0/0x3b4 [0x801a7350] hrtimer_run_queues+0xc4/0xd8 [0x801a597c] update_process_times+0x3c/0x88 [0x801b5a98] tick_periodic+0x50/0xd8 [0x801b5bf4] tick_handle_periodic+0x24/0x84 [0x8010ffc4] twd_handler+0x38/0x48 [0x8017d220] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0xa8/0x244 [0x80176e9c] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x3c [0x8052e3a8] gic_handle_irq+0x7c/0x90 [0x808ab15c] generic_handle_arch_irq+0x60/0x80 [0x8051191c] call_with_stack+0x1c/0x20 For the frame pointer unwinder, unwind_frame() checks stackframe::fp by stackframe::sp. Since call_with_stack() switches the SP from one stack to another, stackframe::fp and stackframe: :sp will point to different stacks, so we can no longer check stackframe::fp by stackframe::sp. Skip checking stackframe::fp at this point to avoid this problem. Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Waleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
09cffecaa7
commit
5854e4d853
@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
|
||||
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/traps.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include "reboot.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Unwind the current stack frame and store the new register values in the
|
||||
@ -39,29 +41,53 @@
|
||||
* Note that with framepointer enabled, even the leaf functions have the same
|
||||
* prologue and epilogue, therefore we can ignore the LR value in this case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
|
||||
|
||||
extern unsigned long call_with_stack_end;
|
||||
|
||||
static int frame_pointer_check(struct stackframe *frame)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long high, low;
|
||||
unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
|
||||
unsigned long pc = frame->pc;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* call_with_stack() is the only place we allow SP to jump from one
|
||||
* stack to another, with FP and SP pointing to different stacks,
|
||||
* skipping the FP boundary check at this point.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pc >= (unsigned long)&call_with_stack &&
|
||||
pc < (unsigned long)&call_with_stack_end)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* only go to a higher address on the stack */
|
||||
low = frame->sp;
|
||||
high = ALIGN(low, THREAD_SIZE);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
|
||||
/* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
|
||||
if (fp < low + 4 || fp > high - 4)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
if (fp < low + 12 || fp > high - 4)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
|
||||
|
||||
if (frame_pointer_check(frame))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* restore the registers from the stack frame */
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
|
||||
frame->sp = frame->fp;
|
||||
frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
|
||||
frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 4));
|
||||
#else
|
||||
/* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
|
||||
if (fp < low + 12 || fp > high - 4)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* restore the registers from the stack frame */
|
||||
frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 12));
|
||||
frame->sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 8));
|
||||
frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 4));
|
||||
|
@ -46,4 +46,6 @@ UNWIND( .setfp fpreg, sp )
|
||||
pop {fpreg, pc}
|
||||
UNWIND( .fnend )
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
.globl call_with_stack_end
|
||||
call_with_stack_end:
|
||||
ENDPROC(call_with_stack)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user