mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 09:13:38 +00:00
locking: rtmutex: Fix wake_q logic in task_blocks_on_rt_mutex
Anders had bisected a crash using PREEMPT_RT with linux-next and isolated it down to commit894d1b3db4
("locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock"), where it seemed the wake_q structure was somehow getting corrupted causing a null pointer traversal. I was able to easily repoduce this with PREEMPT_RT and managed to isolate down that through various call stacks we were actually calling wake_up_q() twice on the same wake_q. I found that in the problematic commit, I had added the wake_up_q() call in task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() around __ww_mutex_add_waiter(), following a similar pattern in __mutex_lock_common(). However, its just wrong. We haven't dropped the lock->wait_lock, so its contrary to the point of the original patch. And it didn't match the __mutex_lock_common() logic of re-initializing the wake_q after calling it midway in the stack. Looking at it now, the wake_up_q() call is incorrect and should just be removed. So drop the erronious logic I had added. Fixes:894d1b3db4
("locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6afb936f-17c7-43fa-90e0-b9e780866097@app.fastmail.com/ Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114190051.552665-1-jstultz@google.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
0664e2c311
commit
82f9cc0949
@ -1248,10 +1248,7 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check whether the waiter should back out immediately */
|
||||
rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex);
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
res = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q);
|
||||
wake_up_q(wake_q);
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
if (res) {
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock);
|
||||
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user