mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-01-09 14:50:19 +00:00
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes
refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
beed9263f4
commit
ec35e48b28
@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_get_delayed_node(
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&root->inode_lock);
|
||||
node = radix_tree_lookup(&root->delayed_nodes_tree, ino);
|
||||
|
||||
if (node) {
|
||||
if (btrfs_inode->delayed_node) {
|
||||
refcount_inc(&node->refs); /* can be accessed */
|
||||
@ -94,9 +95,30 @@ static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_get_delayed_node(
|
||||
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
btrfs_inode->delayed_node = node;
|
||||
/* can be accessed and cached in the inode */
|
||||
refcount_add(2, &node->refs);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It's possible that we're racing into the middle of removing
|
||||
* this node from the radix tree. In this case, the refcount
|
||||
* was zero and it should never go back to one. Just return
|
||||
* NULL like it was never in the radix at all; our release
|
||||
* function is in the process of removing it.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Some implementations of refcount_inc refuse to bump the
|
||||
* refcount once it has hit zero. If we don't do this dance
|
||||
* here, refcount_inc() may decide to just WARN_ONCE() instead
|
||||
* of actually bumping the refcount.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If this node is properly in the radix, we want to bump the
|
||||
* refcount twice, once for the inode and once for this get
|
||||
* operation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&node->refs)) {
|
||||
refcount_inc(&node->refs);
|
||||
btrfs_inode->delayed_node = node;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
node = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -254,17 +276,18 @@ static void __btrfs_release_delayed_node(
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs)) {
|
||||
bool free = false;
|
||||
struct btrfs_root *root = delayed_node->root;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&root->inode_lock);
|
||||
if (refcount_read(&delayed_node->refs) == 0) {
|
||||
radix_tree_delete(&root->delayed_nodes_tree,
|
||||
delayed_node->inode_id);
|
||||
free = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Once our refcount goes to zero, nobody is allowed to bump it
|
||||
* back up. We can delete it now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ASSERT(refcount_read(&delayed_node->refs) == 0);
|
||||
radix_tree_delete(&root->delayed_nodes_tree,
|
||||
delayed_node->inode_id);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
|
||||
if (free)
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, delayed_node);
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, delayed_node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user