I see no good reason to keep both rtl8169_reinit_task and rtl8169_reset_task:
- rtl8169_reinit_task adds a software failure point which does relate to
any hardware state
- they handle hardware the same. Remember that rtl8169_reinit_task was
introduced in the 8169 only era to handle PCI errors way before the 8168
asked for pll and firmware ops and compare :
rtl8169_reinit_task | rtl8169_reset_task
----------------------------+--------------------------
rtl8169_wait_for_quiescence | rtl8169_hw_reset
rtl8169_update_counters | rtl8169_wait_for_quiescence
rtl8169_hw_reset | rtl_hw_start
rtl8169_rx_missed | rtl8169_check_link_status
rtl_pll_power_down |
rtl_request_firmware |
rtl8169_init_phy |
rtl_pll_power_up |
rtl_hw_start |
rtl8169_check_link_status |
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
209e5ac83b