Tero Roponen a78f57af61 libata: init ata_print_id to 0
When comparing the dmesg between 3.4-rc3 and 3.4-rc4 I found the
following differences:

 -ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff100 irq 47
 -ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff180 irq 47
 -ata3: DUMMY
 +ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff100 irq 47
 +ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff180 irq 47
  ata4: DUMMY
  ata5: DUMMY
 -ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff380 irq 47
 +ata6: DUMMY
 +ata7: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff380 irq 47

The change of numbering comes from commit 85d6725b7c0d7e3f ("libata:
make ata_print_id atomic") that changed lines like

	ap->print_id = ata_print_id++;
		to
	ap->print_id = atomic_inc_return(&ata_print_id);

As the latter behaves like ++ata_print_id, we must initialize
it to zero to start the numbering from one.

Signed-off-by: Tero Roponen <tero.roponen@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
2012-05-03 14:07:59 -04:00
..
2012-05-03 14:07:59 -04:00
2012-04-12 15:57:51 -04:00
2012-04-12 15:57:51 -04:00
2011-07-23 18:07:27 -04:00
2011-10-14 13:10:42 -04:00
2011-03-02 02:36:46 -05:00
2011-10-14 13:22:54 -04:00
2008-01-23 05:24:15 -05:00
2011-11-09 01:36:49 -05:00
2011-07-23 17:57:36 -04:00
2007-07-02 10:17:42 -04:00